Photo Courtesy: newindianexpress.com
Only 31 runs in five innings, the Captain Rohit Sharma decides to sit out. The decison by Rohit Sharma, captain of the Indian cricket team, to miss the final Test match against Austrailia has set tongues wagging. Is it an act of cowardice?, Isn’t it a failure to lead from the front at a time when the team needed him the most? While his reasons may be personal or tactical, this decision opens up a broader discussion—what does true leadership on the cricket field look like? And how do captains, past and present, measure up when the stakes are high?
The Role of a Captain in Cricket
Cricket captains are more than strategists; they’re symbols of hope, resilience, and inspiration. They don’t just direct plays—they lead by example, especially when the chips are down. Picture this: your captain, the backbone of the team, decides to step away during a make-or-break match. The morale dips, doubts creep in, and questions about leadership arise. This is the crux of Rohit’s absence—a timing that couldn’t have been worse.
Rohit’s Decision: Is it a Failure of Leadership?
Leadership isn’t a cloak you wear when things are going well. It’s revealed in adversity, in standing firm when the ground beneath you shakes. Rohit’s decision, whether influenced by personal or professional reasons, sends a ripple effect through the team. It raises more questions than it answers. Also, he is the first Indian Captain to do so.
Gautam Gambhir’s Role
The role of Gautam Gambhir, the Indian head coach is also equally important. He must be having an important role and he say in final 11 members playing in the match but still he doesn’t have the final say and he doesn’t have the final authority over Captain. His roll in this decision or letting it happen like this, either way shows him in poor light.
